“FROM THE FORCES THAT BROUGHT YOU X-MEN”—
—comes a movie that’s nowhere near as good.
In the opinion of your humble movie reviewer, it tends to be bad
news when studios or filmmakers can’t let a movie stand on
its own when they market it. So they try to connect it to a bigger,
more popular movie or franchise. I realize that 20th Century Fox
produced both the X-Men movies and Elektra. I
know Marvel Studios’ head honcho, Avi Arad,
worked on both those films. But other than that… what connection
do those films share? The simple answer is none, but Fox wants us
to think otherwise. If the film had any connection it would be to
the 2003 movie Daredevil, love it or hate it (AN: And boy
do I hate it), since that introduced the character of Elektra Natchios
(Garner) to the cinema. And even though the thought
of “Oh wow! I can’t wait to see an Elektra movie starring
Jennifer Garner now!” seemed to be the last thing on moviegoers’
minds when exiting the mediocre theatrical version of Daredevil,
Fox and Marvel deemed it necessary to spend a good chunk of
money on giving the character her own movie. If they were to make
a Daredevil spin-off, the only character in that movie
I wanted to see more of by the end was Colin Farrell’s
Bullseye. Despite being a bit of a departure from his comic counterpart,
he was the most interesting and entertaining character in that entire
film.
So Garner’s back after getting royally 0WNED
by Bullseye, now wearing red instead of the boring black leather,
and killing people for money and taking hits from her ridiculously
annoying agent, McCabe (Cunningham), after she
was rejected by her mentor, Stick (Stamp), the
catalyst of her resurrection. Now why wasn’t Stick in Daredevil?
I mean he was the guy who mentored and trained Matt Murdock, taught
him how to hone and use his abilities. But oh well, Stick is in
Elektra, and he’s actually pretty cool for the most
part, even when he’s spouting rather trite dialogue about
prophesies, good and evil, whatever bullshit the three screenwriters
for this movie strung together.
I think the problem is, Garner was such a dull, rushed, and one-dimensional
character in Daredevil, it really serves no one to make
this character and actress the focus of her own movie. The Elektra
of the comics is one cold, calculating, uptight individual. She’s
foreign, exotic, and darkly alluring. Garner just doesn’t
bring that to the role. She tries, but in the end it’s really
not convincing, especially with her annoyingly pouty lips (Jen babe,
collagen is not your friend) and her exaggerated movements, more
fit for models on a runway. Character development is attempted in
making Elektra obsessive-compulsive, seemingly because the character
is so paper-thin they had to give her some sort of quirk.
After receiving her latest assignment, which is actually to kill
two people she befriends—Mark Miller (Visnjic)
and his bratty, teenaged daughter, Abigail (Prout)—Elektra
decides instead to protect them from The Hand, an evil league of
ninja assassins searching for “the treasure” (three
writers on this movie and they couldn’t come up with a better
name than “the treasure”?). Abigail’s presence
is definitely a detraction since she’s such an idiot and general
“pain in the ass” as Garner clearly states in the film
that, deep down… the repressed sadistic side of myself wouldn’t
have minded so much if one of those ninjas would just pop up and
make a salad out of her. In fact, through the whole thing I was
rather hoping it would happen. For whatever reason, there’s
the useless romance between Elektra and Miller, but it doesn’t
go anywhere.
The villains, oh boy, the villains. They answer to Master Roshi
(Tagawa), and are led by his son, Kirigi (Lee),
and are probably the most non-formidable force of bad guys in the
history of bad comic book movies or maybe just movies, period. All
of them are one-dimensional rip-offs of anime archetypes seen in
better works such as Ninja Scroll or Vampire Hunter
D. At least those were able to deliver on the action along
with excessive amounts of juicy violence and gore, something this
blood-less family film could’ve used, especially when you
think about how most Elektra stories are for mature, older readers.
As hybridmagazine’s resident comics connoisseur (AN: shameless
and arrogantly self-proclaimed title), I must disappointingly inform
you of the complete misuse of one of the more well-known characters
from Daredevil’s rogues’ gallery, Typhoid Mary (Norwegian
model, Malthe). In the comics, Mary is a ridiculously
twisted schizophrenic with pyrokinetic powers who wants to destroy
men, and also Daredevil’s ex-lover. Here she’s just
another half-baked, useless-in-a-fight baddie who has the power
to kill whatever is around her.
The fights and action sequences in this movie are nothing special,
albeit they are horrendously over-stylized as if they were trying
to make a Hollywood movie look like Hero or House Of
Flying Daggers. My advice to Rob Bowman? Leave
it to the pros. And since none of the opponents are really no match
for Sydney Bristow v.2.0 or Sydney Bristow-lite, it all makes for
a rather boring affair.
Since Elektra is the first of a large round of comic
book-based features due out this year, its mediocrity might be somewhat
symbolic of what’s coming next month—Warner Brothers’
Constantine, based on DC Vertigo’s “The Hellblazer”
and the sequel no one wants to see, Son Of The Mask. Masamune
Shirow’s Appleseed is already playing in
limited release in the U.S. as of today. April will see the release
of Frank Miller’s Sin City; June,
the long-anticipated Batman Begins. Marvel gets another
chance in July with Fantastic Four. Somewhere along the
way, excrement that will be called Man-thing and The
Crow: Wicked Prayer will be released direct to video. Almost
enough to make you long for the days of Roger Corman’s
infamous Fantastic Four movie… just kidding.
—Jeffrey “The Vile One” Harris