|

Ms. Alabama Nursing Home is a 42-minute documentary
that screened during the SXSW 2003 film festival. Director
Anne Paas followed her great aunt Helen during
her participation in the Ms. Nursing Home Alabama contest.
Within the film, Paas explores a variety of issues, including
care of the elderly and racism.
NANCY SEMIN: I found the end scene, where your aunt makes
a comment that could be described as “genteel racism” as one
of the audience members referred to it. Were you startled
by your aunt’s comments?
Anne Paas: I grew up in Minnesota, and her older sister
lived in Minnesota with us, and I was very aware that she
had, I think it’s gentle to call it “genteel racism,” I think
it’s outright racism which I’ve always railed against, so
I wasn’t surprised she was saying those comments. I think
before she said that she looked at me and said, “I probably
shouldn’t put this on tape.” I said, “Why do you think you
didn’t win?” and she said, “Well, I probably shouldn’t put
this on tape.” I said, “No, go ahead, it’s fine.” And then
she said, like, “It’s kind of fixed,” and she went on to say
it. So I think she was aware that her racism was not going
to be accepted, but I think it goes to show how disappointed,
how bitter she was, and what form of bitterness came out.
NS: I think what’s so startling, and why it’s such an
interesting thing that you inserted, I think as an audience
member, you never really see it coming. She’s just a sweet,
old lady, and then you get that comment, and there’s kind
of that hushed silence, so I thought it was a great technique,
but that brings me to the second question. But you don’t at
any point, in a lot of documentaries, you can hear the director
asking a question and your voice is pretty much absent. Was
that a conscious choice?
AP: Yeah, it was. I mean I love the verité documentary
technique of the Maysles brothers and Pennebaker.
And I think unless my voice was needed, I felt I wasn’t the
subject of the documentary. I was trying to follow her and
be as true to what I was witnessing as possible. So, that’s
the reason I chose not to put my voice in. At the beginning
you hear it, you hear it at the peach stand, she says, “Anne,
get me some of those peaches.”
NS: I didn’t hear that actually.
AP: I think you’re very aware that she’s aware of
me, because she says, “I’ll see you in the morning.” But otherwise
I tried to keep myself as much out of it as possible.
NS: What about the fact that, well we know that she is
your relative, because you tell us at the end [during the
Q&A] but do you have any plans to insert that information,
or did you make a specific choice to leave that you?
AP: I think I had access to her because she’s my relative,
and there is a certain rapport, but I hope in no way that
influenced me in terms of how I depicted her. For me she was
just another documentary subject.
NS: So during the Q&A you said that you felt, if you
had the chance to develop the film further, there were more
complex issues you would like to bring to the fore. What sort
of ideas do you have?
AP: I felt there were several themes I tried to have
come across in the documentary, but were at the forefront,
one of them is the different agendas people have. You see
Pat Glazier, who is the head of activities and she
is consistently drilling Helen, and telling her “You have
to practice the questions, what are we going to say, what
are you going to say, Helen, try to make things come out as
clear as possible.” And that’s one of the reasons I think
she stumbles, too, because she’s been drilled so hard. And
I think that would be an aspect to look into, if I did a longer
feature, I think racism is another issue, because for example.
It’s interesting because it’s very complex in the South. Older
people have grown up in a different era, and how do they try
to assimilate it into some sort of… event that takes place
in modern days, some of the questions they ask. What about
the help, that’s another thing. You could see some of the
people had no idea what was going on, and they dressed them
up and brought them in and were parading them around, and
to whose benefit is it? I think another question, the beauty
pageant. I have a dislike of beauty pageants, but it was really
interesting to see that it was actually giving them something
to live for, not just to look forward to, but to live for,
because for older people, if they have something to look forward
to, they actually are able to live longer, so it was that
balance that I think was interesting.
NS: What about issues of ageism? Did you feel there’s
a social agenda that way within the film?
AP: Ageism in terms of…
NS: Dispelling prejudices about older people?
AP: I think people don’t spend enough time with older
people. I think older people are complex, and people tend
to treat them like children, and you see that in the film,
and it’s definitely, my great aunt is hard to handle sometimes
because of her short temper, but she’s a whole person and
I think it’s important that people realize that.
NS: What plans do you have for distribution?
AP: This was the second screening at South By Southwest,
so I would love to be picked up, but no plans at this point.
 |