Directors: Robert Rodriguez, Frank Miller,
Quentin Tarantino
Producers: Frank Miller, Robert Rodriguez,
Bob Weinstein, Harvey Weinstein
Written by: Frank Miller, Robert Rodriguez
Cast: Jessica Alba, Rosario Dawson, Elijah
Wood, Bruce Willis, Benicio Del Toro, Clive Owen, Michael Clarke
Duncan, Carla Gugino, Josh Hartnett, Michael Madsen, Jamie King,
Brittany Murphy, Mickey Rourke, Nick Stahl, Rutger Hauer, Devon
Aoki, Marley Shelton, Nicky Katt
Rating:
Although I currently reside (one can’t quite call it “living”)
in Austin, Texas, I have little love for the city’s two indigenous
directors, Richard Linklater and Robert
Rodriguez, both of whom are so lauded within this town
that they could disembowel Lady Bird Johnson and
tag team her corpse while denouncing Stevie Ray Vaughn
and simultaneously defecating on a Texas flag to the applause and
exaltation of dreadlock’d Austinites. (My admission of dislike
concerning those men could, in fact, result in Harry Knowles
and his mongoloid crew of grossly overweight sycophants stealing
me from my bed and burning me alive at a specialized Ain’t
It Cool News event held at the Alamo Drafthouse while Return
Of The Jedi footage of a fallen Darth Vader being immolated
plays on loop in the background, so tell no one what you read here.)
Linklater, responsible for the canonized-yet-unwatchable Slacker
and the galaxy’s second most pretentious film (after Slacker),
Waking Life, last year directed Before Sunset,
which I admit to savoring, despite its agonizingly socio-political
first half hour. And I was impressed, and I believed that redemption
was possible. Rodriguez, whom I, too, idolized in the wake of a
triad of films—El Mariachi, Desperado, and From
Dusk Till Dawn—which were extraordinary to me at 16,
went on to helm dreck like The Faculty, the Spy Kids
trilogy, and Once Upon A Time In Mexico, which makes me
ashamed to live only a few hours from Mexico. Rodriguez had evolved
from modest, maverick DIY director to fire-and-brimstone proselytizer
of digital cameras and maniacal hydra filmmaker with his strained
talent controlling every aspect of his “flicks,” from
cinematographing to scoring. As a result, he hadn’t directed
an above-middling movie in nigh on seven years. And then there was
Sin City, the most accurate and artful comic book film
thus far, and once more I believe that redemption is possible.
Sin City is the story of Hartigan (Willis),
a veteran, good-hearted cop determined to end the reign of terror
of Junior (Stahl), a sociopathic, pedophilic child
murderer, before he retires or his good heart stops ticking. It
is the story of Marv (Rourke), a schizophrenic
ex-con with the face of a melting candle, who vows to find and make
pay the man responsible for killing an angelic prostitute named
Goldie (King) who, for one rare night of his life,
showed Marv beauty. It is the story of Dwight (Owen),
a gun-slinging, sneaker-sporting loner intent on mending a frayed
truce between the autonomous prostitutes of Old Town and the police,
personal sacrifice be damned. And it is once again the story of
Hartigan, who, eight years after his encounter with Junior, must
relive the nightmare and protect a stripper named Nancy (Alba)
from a fetid menace known only as That Yellow Bastard. These are
but a few stories of the desperate, gnarled inhabitants of Basin
City, a noir-world perpetually frozen somewhere between the 1940s
and Hell.
The most immediately striking aspect of Sin City is its
remarkable visual style, which almost, almost, almost captures the
inimitable imagery of (co-director and comic book master) Frank
Miller’s meticulous black-and-white graphic novels.
A prelude vignette featuring Josh Hartnett and
Marley Shelton as a pair of unnamed partygoers,
both in possession of secrets (and based on the anthologized Sin
City short “The Customer is Always Right”), sets
an indelible visual standard of digital and crisp black-and-white
punctuated by dashes of color ranging from delicate (notice how
Shelton’s eyes flicker jade as Hartnett lights her cigarette)
to deliberate (That Yellow Bastard and his monochromatic saffron
blood). The viewer is transported directly to Basin City, and the
film’s tonal effectiveness is intrinsically dependent on the
look of the picture; never is it excessive or valueless. To emulate
Miller’s artwork cinematically, Sin City pays homage
to its paginated source material with distinctive stylistic flourishes,
such as the luminescent whiteness of blood, rain, and specific articles
of characters’ costumes; camera placement which mirrors to
exactitude panels of corresponding Sin City comics; and
the silhouetting of key story moments which bear Miller’s
emblematic linework. Similar to Sky Captain And The World Of
Tomorrow and most of the Star Wars prequels, Sin
City was shot with digital cameras with actors situated before
nothing more than bleak blue screens, and the sets created via computer
after the commencement of principal photography; though still a
developing technology, and sometimes imperfect and awkward, this
property and its beautiful visual moodiness would likely have been
impossible to convey with standard methods.
In spite of Sin City primarily being shot on ghost sets,
its actors have, paradoxically, seldom appeared more alive and invested
in the mini-universe of a film. Willis, in particular,
awakens from a mossy hibernation induced by the The Whole ___
Yards franchise, grizzly and unshaven, with the cross of a
martyr cut into his character’s face. Inherent in Hartigan
are a multitude of base but complex human emotions—anger,
sadness, determination—so finely channeled by Willis that
the character’s plight, though archetypical and platitudinous,
proves surreptitiously affecting. Likewise, Rourke’s brutish
and battleworn Marv, the steelfisted goon, is given deft vulnerability
by the makeup-slabbed actor in the character’s quieter moments.
And Owen’s Dwight, though confident and cavalier, is poured
a foundation of sorrowful resolve through vocal intonation and prescient
stares. Although we are not given much time with these characters,
a great deal is conveyed by economic and telling first-person voice-overs
which run the course of each character’s episode(s) and add
an unexpected layer of sympathy to each major male player. Less
fortunate are the female denizens of Sin City, whose roles
are restricted to either sexual objects or mostly-hardened victims.
Jessica Alba’s Nancy and Rosario
Dawson’s Gail, the most developed (no pun intended)
of the film’s women, both exude a strength garnered from the
hardships they’ve weathered, but ultimately exist solely to
further the redemptive tales of the men in their lives; which isn’t
to say that the actresses don’t fare well, because they do,
but this is a film not centered on the plights of women, just as
The Banger Sisters was unconcerned with analyzing the ethicality
of men who do what they must to survive.
It is that blurred, contradictory ethicality which elevates Sin
City beyond the stolid comic book or action genres and aligns
it with the noir films of old; yes, Sin City is chiefly
a fetishistic crime fantasy, but it also makes a profound and weirdly
inspirational comment on the human condition. Hartigan, Marv, and
Dwight are all highly flawed and haunted characters, each morally
removed from society on a unique level; all three seem grossly ill-equipped
to crawl up from their hovel-lives, transcend their defects, and
leave Basin City bettered by their influence because those they
care for need them. And yet, all three characters do just that,
tearing their way through turncoat partners, child rapists, evangelical
cannibal martial artists, corrupt senators, Irish mercenaries, golden-eyed
gang enforcers, and Yellow Bastards with determination that is almost
sweet in its potency. The entire film, in effect, is an affirmation
of the adage that states “anything’s possible if you
put your mind to it,” as well as a metaphorical advertisement
that redemption, even for the worst of the worst, is always an option.
Truly, to observe Marv give all he has and act as Goldie’s
avenging angel of death is to be moved. Also fascinating and contributory
to the film’s richness is Miller’s take on women: In
Sin City they serve as both the catalysts for the male
protagonists’ predicaments as well as the divine sources of
strength which allow them to push forward and overcome; the film,
despite carrying what seems to be an almost offensive anti-feminist
agenda, actually asserts that women are the only thing in the world
worth fighting for.
In the wake of the previous paragraph, which I must admit to being
embarrassed to have written because of its pseudo-intellectualness,
I would like to state plainly that Sin City is, most importantly,
both violent and fun as ten country miles of fuck. Expect gushing
blood and severed limbs and disembodied heads and wolves eating
the flesh of their masters and swords through heads and all those
other things the cinema is stubborn to supply. And for those who
like to masturbate during or directly after movies, Sin City
contains sustained semi-nudity and ample full-on nudity (though
not nearly as much as the graphic novels). The first great film
of the year, Sin City not only offers a near-literal (via
cinema) translation of a remarkable collection of comic books, but
also heralds the resurrection of Robert Rodriguez; perhaps he’ll
heed the lessons learned on this picture and realize the benefits
of getting by with a little help from his friends.
—Nathan Baran
hybridCinema
Ratings Guide:
Take a pal and pay full price for both tickets.
It’s worth a full-price ticket.
It’s worth a matinee ticket.
Wait for video rental.
Check out the video from the library, if you must.
While we would never encourage anyone to destroy a video...
hybridmagazine.com is updated daily except when
it isn't.
New film reviews are posted every week like faulty clockwork.
Wanna write for hybrid? Send us an e-mail.