Modern audiences have come to expect a greater realism from the
new crop of historical epics that have arisen in Gladiator’s
wake. Dirt, dried blood, scars, even split ends, are all part of
the new verisimilitude, but despite the cosmetic changes, these
new epics are as rigorously formal and thuddingly simple as their
Golden Age counterparts. Case in point, director Ridley
Scott’s new, heavily fictionalized Crusader epic,
Kingdom Of Heaven, is in many ways simply a rehash of his
own Gladiator, which was itself a reworking of Anthony
Mann’s The Fall Of The Roman Empire. Of
course the setting is different, (12th-century Jerusalem) and Ridley
has new toys to play with (catapults, siege towers), but the only
thing substantially different in this new film is a persistent attitude
of cynicism toward organized religion.
Orlando Bloom, who seems stuck in period roles,
(LOTR, Troy, Pirates Of The Caribbean) is our hero Balian,
a character based on an actual crusader, though as in Gladiator,
Scott takes considerable license. We meet Balian, a humble blacksmith,
shortly after the deaths of his daughter and wife. His long-absent
father, the Lord Godfrey (Neeson) is riding through
town on his way back to the Holy Land. Offered a chance to leave,
Balian gloomily turns him down. But Balian has a change of heart,
after killing a nasty, local priest for claiming that his wife’s
suicide has put her in Hell. The killing of the priest, like the
suicide of Balian’s wife, barely seem to have any weight over
the rest of the film; murder is just a good reason to hit the road.
After a raucous journey, Balian arrives in the Holy Land to find
a kingdom divided. The enlightened allies of the King Baldwin, a
leper who wears a metal mask (an unrecognizable Norton),
seek to achieve a harmonious co-existence with their Muslim neighbors,
but are undermined by the murderous Knights Templar and by Guy de
Lusignan, a hissable villain married to the King’s sister
Sibylla (Green). The lovely proto-feminist Sibylla
becomes immediately infatuated with Balian, and the king strikes
upon a plan to remarry her to Balian and make him his heir, but
Balian turns them down flat, babbling something about how this must
be “Kingdom of Conscience.” This is of course nearly
exactly the same deal that Russell Crowe rejects
in Gladiator. At least in that film Maximus had some conflicting
loyalties, but here Balian’s rejection makes no sense at all.
He is merely conforming to the modern notion of heroism that suggests
that the great leader must never chose (much less desire) power,
but only accept it when circumstances force it on him, which is
exactly what happens when the new King Guy’s army is routed
by the Muslim King Saladin. Nietzsche would be
dismayed to see how much contempt modern screenwriters have for
the Will To Power.
Bloom’s Balian resembles Crowe’s Maximus in several
other ways. He is brave and brutal—at one point he defeats
a group of Templars with his bare hands, in a scene that would have
been more convincing had Crowe played it—but also noble and
enlightened, and aside from the occasional rousing speech, he has
almost nothing to say. Dialogue plays so small a role in these new
epics, partially because the pace is so maddeningly fast. I know
modern audiences don’t have much patience, but at just under
two and a half hours, the filmmakers barely have time to develop
any of the several characters and we in the audience are never given
a chance to really savor any of Ridley Scott’s typically sumptuous
visuals.
As I’ve said, what distinguishes Kingdom Of Heaven
and invites controversy is the film’s cynical views on organized
religion. Those characters claiming religious motivation are either
fools or frauds. It would have made more dramatic sense for Balian
to at least start out as a believer, but he is always too modern
and never seems truly inspired, so his disillusionment comes off
as a bit shallow. For good measure, Scott offers a miniaturization
of this problem on the Muslim side, but these scenes feel self-conscious
and, like everything else Kingdom Of Heaven, are treated
in such a cursory manner that we hardly care about the film’s
message.
—Edward Rholes